ABSTRACT
Se hace una reseña histórica de la fundación de la Asociación Médica Franco-Argentina. Se mencionan sus propósitos fundacionales, sus protagonistas y su contexto social.
A historical review of the foundation of the Franco-Argentine Medical Association is made. Its foundational purposes, their protagonists and the social context are mentioned.
Subject(s)
History, 20th Century , Physicians/history , Societies, Medical/history , Scientific Communication and Diffusion , Argentina , France , History of Medicine , International CooperationABSTRACT
En la presente entrevista, realizada en 1999, el doctor Guillermo Soberón Acevedo (1925- 2020) opina sobre distintos temas relacionados con la medicina y la salud pública. Comenta su proceso de formación como médico, la responsabilidad de los especialistas que se preparan en el extranjero y regresan a México, así como sus trabajos como rector de la UNAM y en el sector público, donde dirigió la transformación de la entonces Secretaría de Salubridad y Asistencia en la actual Secretaría de Salud. Asimismo, aborda temas como el carácter mutifacético de la medicina, la importancia de la investigación y las facultades de medicina, el valor de la certificación, el trabajo de los colegios y las asociaciones médicas y el futuro de la ciencia médica, además de que ofrece su punto de vista sobre la Homeopatía.
In this interview, conducted in 1999, Dr. Guillermo Soberón Acevedo (1925-2020) gives his opinion on different topics related to medicine and public health. He comments on his training process as a doctor, the responsabilities of the specialists who prepare abroad and return to Mexico, as well as his work as Rector of the Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (National Autonomous University of Mexico) As well as his experience in the public sector, in which he directed the transformation of the then Secretaría de Salubridad y Asistencia (Ministry of Healthiness and Assistance) into the current Secretaría de Salud (Ministry of Health). It also addresses topics such as the multifaceted nature of medicine, the importance of research and medical schools, the value of certification, the work of medical colleges and associations, and the future of medical science, in addition to offering his point of view on Homeopathy.
Subject(s)
Humans , History, 20th Century , Interviews as Topic , Famous Persons , Health Policy/historyABSTRACT
The Korean Medical Association (KMA) has been requested to respond proactively and effectively to local agendas reflecting global perspectives in order to lead our society through the dynamic and fast-changing health care environment, which faces issues such as big data, artificial intelligence, and the increasing health-related impacts of climate change and fine particulate matter. Since the KMA joined the World Medical Association (WMA) in 1949 and the Confederation of Medical Associations in Asia and Oceania (CMAAO) in 1956, the KMA has made continuous progress in international affairs. Based on these achievements, the KMA has recently played important roles, such as the chair of the WMA Finance and Planning Committee, a council member in the WMA, and a council chair in the CMAAO. For the next several decades, the WMA and CMAAO are still expected to be the basic channels for sharing trends and visions, discussing health challenges across borders, and developing powerful initiatives that improve people's health. Maintaining current partnerships with the WMA and CMAAO and strengthening strategic collaboration with promising national medical associations are required to extend the KMA's influence. Training next-generation representatives to build capacity for international relations might also be necessary for the sustainability of international collaboration. Through the KMA's advancements in international affairs, incorporating harmonious perspectives on local, regional, and global agendas, the KMA is fully expected to contribute to addressing health challenges by demonstrating its leadership.
Subject(s)
Artificial Intelligence , Asia , Climate Change , Cooperative Behavior , Delivery of Health Care , Internationality , Leadership , Oceania , Particulate MatterABSTRACT
Buscamos analisar a agenda política das principais entidades médicas nacionais brasileiras e suas lutas em torno do Programa Mais Médicos do Ministério da Saúde do Brasil. Trata-se de pesquisa de natureza qualitativa, de nível exploratório e de caráter analítico, baseada em diversas fontes que veicularam posições dessas entidades, de maio de 2010 a dezembro de 2014, e em publicações da imprensa, de junho de 2013 a dezembro de 2014, que foram sistematizadas segundo categorias elaboradas a partir da própria análise. Identificamos que as entidades médicas brasileiras realizaram intensa atuação conjunta, integrando interesses voltados aos setores público e privado. O apogeu se deu entre junho e outubro de 2013, nas mobilizações de resistência ao Programa Mais Médicos. Entretanto, registramos que divergências em torno das lutas contra este Programa fragilizaram as articulações políticas dessas entidades que haviam sido construídas nos últimos anos.
We sought to analyze the political agenda of the main Brazilian national medical entities and their struggles around the More Doctors Program implemented by the Brazilian Ministry of Health. It is a research of qualitative nature, of exploratory level and of analytical character, based on several sources presenting positions of these entities, from May 2010 to December 2014, and in press publications, from June 2013 to December 2014, systematized according to categories elaborated from the analysis itself. We identified that the Brazilian medical entities performed intense joint action integrating interests directed to the public and private sectors. The apogee took place between June and October of 2013, through mobilizations of resistance to the More Doctors Program. However, we note that divergences around the struggles against this Program have weakened the political links of these entities that had been built in recent years.
Nuestro objetivo fue analizar la agenda política de las principales entidades médicas nacionales brasileñas y sus luchas frente al programa Más Médicos del Ministerio de la Salud de Brasil. Se trata de investigación de naturaleza cualitativa, de nivel exploratorio y de carácter analítico con base en diversas fuentes que publicaron posiciones de esas entidades, desde mayo de 2010 a diciembre de 2014 y en publicaciones de la prensa, de junio de 2013 a diciembre de 2104, que han sido sistematizadas según categorías elaboradas a partir del propio análisis. Identificamos que las entidades médicas brasileñas realizaron una intensa actuación conjunta integrando intereses enfocados en los sectores público y privado. El apogeo fue entre junio y octubre de 2013 en las movilizaciones de resistencia al Programa Más Médicos. No obstante, registramos que las divergencias alrededor de las luchas contra este Programa fragilizaron las articulaciones políticas de esas entidades que se habían construido en los últimos años.
Subject(s)
Humans , Physicians/supply & distribution , Societies, Medical/history , Health Consortia , Unified Health System/organization & administration , Brazil , Government Programs/trendsABSTRACT
1) To improve the quality of medical care and to ensure patient safety, physicians have the professional duty and responsibility to constantly study the newest medical knowledge and technology.<BR>2) The terminology for “continuing education”for physicians differs in meaning from that generally used to refer to “life-long education.”<BR>3) Continuing medical education (CME) in Japan is independently carried out by medical associations and by numerous academic medical societies. Present CME activities in Japan are reviewed, and CME in the United States is explained.<BR>4) Continuing professional development is introduced as a new paradigm of CME for physicians, created to improve the health-care system in the United Kingdom.<BR>5) To further improve CME for physicians in Japan, prospective issues are discussed. Establishment of a third-party organization that discusses, manages, and operates the CME system for physicians, is strongly recommended.